DODGE RAM FORUM banner

1 - 20 of 269 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
675 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
I am considering the 2014 2500 with the 6.4L hemi. What is your real world gas mileage? This will be the 4X4 crew cab with 8 foot bed. Highway mileage and city mileage figures would be appreciated. The one test I have seen showed only 11.0 highway mileage which I would not live with.
thanks.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
355 Posts
At less than 3000 miles it is still too early to tell but so far I am averaging about 12.5 in a mix of highway 70+ mph and suburbia driving. Most miles and time are on the highway. This is hand calculated. I have been charting it from day one and it is slowly increasing.

Typically my EVIC reads around 15.5 on the highway which is really closer to 13.5 hand calculated.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
675 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
At less than 3000 miles it is still too early to tell but so far I am averaging about 12.5 in a mix of highway 70+ mph and suburbia driving. Most miles and time are on the highway. This is hand calculated. I have been charting it from day one and it is slowly increasing.

Typically my EVIC reads around 15.5 on the highway which is really closer to 13.5 hand calculated.
I hope it will end up closer to the 15.5 once it is broken in. This is the problem I am having with the new hemi. Trailer life did a test with the new truck and reported just 11 MPG solo and 8.? towing only 7000 Lbs. My 2009 5.7 averages 9.3 MPG towing 7200 Lbs. with 1000 Lbs. in the bed. I was hoping to upgrade to the new 2014 but am having reservations on which hemi to purchase.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
553 Posts
Is that what the evic is reporting or do you figure it by hand?
thanks
Hand calculation. I check it regularly but not every time. I don't keep a log, not that concerned.The EVIC display seems to be short term, I can get it to change drastically in a short time without trying very hard. It is short enough term that I can get it to change several MPG in a 35 mile commute.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
45 Posts
I hope it will end up closer to the 15.5 once it is broken in. This is the problem I am having with the new hemi. Trailer life did a test with the new truck and reported just 11 MPG solo and 8.? towing only 7000 Lbs. My 2009 5.7 averages 9.3 MPG towing 7200 Lbs. with 1000 Lbs. in the bed. I was hoping to upgrade to the new 2014 but am having reservations on which hemi to purchase.
I have only 840 miles on my 6.4. 4.10 rear end. Too early to tell what the overall average is going to end up. I see you have a 2009 1500 and I can tell you that unless all your trips are longer, steady-state, your not going to see 15.5 avg with a 2500 HD truck. Your going to be disappointed if you expect 1500 mpg out of a 2500 gasser, but your going to be doubling your payload. If you don't need 3000# of payload and are happy with what your 1500 provides, stay with a 1500. The 6.4 is not available in the 1500 platform.

I'm averaging 13 with mine right now. I traded a 2013 3500 6.7 CTD and it was averaging 15 in the summer, 13 in the winter. I'm pleased so far with the mpg with so little mileage on the truck. This 6.4 will get better mileage than the 5.7 in the 2500/3500 platform. I was only seeing 11 with the 2013 CTD pulling my 6500# travel trailer and that was at 65 mph, but the towing power was effortless. I got 9 towing with the 6.4L on a recent trip. Take a look at the 6.4L forum section here. Good reports there and guys are seeing some fantastic unloaded hwy mileage with the 3.73 rear end for a 2500 gasser. I only wanted 4.10's for the gearing advantage and the hills in my area.

Good Luck with your decision!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,694 Posts
I have only 840 miles on my 6.4. 4.10 rear end. Too early to tell what the overall average is going to end up. I see you have a 2009 1500 and I can tell you that unless all your trips are longer, steady-state, your not going to see 15.5 avg with a 2500 HD truck. Your going to be disappointed if you expect 1500 mpg out of a 2500 gasser, but your going to be doubling your payload. If you don't need 3000# of payload and are happy with what your 1500 provides, stay with a 1500. The 6.4 is not available in the 1500 platform.

I'm averaging 13 with mine right now. I traded a 2013 3500 6.7 CTD and it was averaging 15 in the summer, 13 in the winter. I'm pleased so far with the mpg with so little mileage on the truck. This 6.4 will get better mileage than the 5.7 in the 2500/3500 platform. I was only seeing 11 with the 2013 CTD pulling my 6500# travel trailer and that was at 65 mph, but the towing power was effortless. I got 9 towing with the 6.4L on a recent trip. Take a look at the 6.4L forum section here. Good reports there and guys are seeing some fantastic unloaded hwy mileage with the 3.73 rear end for a 2500 gasser. I only wanted 4.10's for the gearing advantage and the hills in my area.

Good Luck with your decision!
Nice honest reply and good info. I am curious, why did you trade your CTD in for the 6.4L Hemi flavor? I ask because I am on the fence myself. My 5.7L does a nice job towing our TT, but I am regretting not getting a Mega cab and thinking of trading. Since I will end up with a 2500 or 3500 Mega Cab, I was thinking since I do tow regularly and living and travelling in the moutainous west, the CTD would be the way to go, but the 6.4L Hemi has it's appeal as well, so I am back and forth.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
675 Posts
Discussion Starter #11
I have only 840 miles on my 6.4. 4.10 rear end. Too early to tell what the overall average is going to end up. I see you have a 2009 1500 and I can tell you that unless all your trips are longer, steady-state, your not going to see 15.5 avg with a 2500 HD truck. Your going to be disappointed if you expect 1500 mpg out of a 2500 gasser, but your going to be doubling your payload. If you don't need 3000# of payload and are happy with what your 1500 provides, stay with a 1500. The 6.4 is not available in the 1500 platform.

I'm averaging 13 with mine right now. I traded a 2013 3500 6.7 CTD and it was averaging 15 in the summer, 13 in the winter. I'm pleased so far with the mpg with so little mileage on the truck. This 6.4 will get better mileage than the 5.7 in the 2500/3500 platform. I was only seeing 11 with the 2013 CTD pulling my 6500# travel trailer and that was at 65 mph, but the towing power was effortless. I got 9 towing with the 6.4L on a recent trip. Take a look at the 6.4L forum section here. Good reports there and guys are seeing some fantastic unloaded hwy mileage with the 3.73 rear end for a 2500 gasser. I only wanted 4.10's for the gearing advantage and the hills in my area.

Good Luck with your decision!
Thanks for the info. As a heavy equipment operator I never wanted a diesel pickup because once you figure the $8,000 option and the extra cost of fuel and maintenance a guy really needs to pull a lot of load most of the time to come out. Just my personal choice. I really had reservations on the 6.4L road test done by trailer life but if they really only saw 11 MPG empty they must have been doing all city driving. I will definitely go with the 6.4 now that you and others have given me good info. to go with.
thanks again.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
45 Posts
Nice honest reply and good info. I am curious, why did you trade your CTD in for the 6.4L Hemi flavor? I ask because I am on the fence myself. My 5.7L does a nice job towing our TT, but I am regretting not getting a Mega cab and thinking of trading. Since I will end up with a 2500 or 3500 Mega Cab, I was thinking since I do tow regularly and living and travelling in the moutainous west, the CTD would be the way to go, but the 6.4L Hemi has it's appeal as well, so I am back and forth.
Haha..I could make this quite complicated. Try to keep it short, though I'm a little long winded most the time. I sold a 2001 5.9L CTD QCLB, that I bought new, to get the 2013. Just outgrew the QC with the family and was tired of the diesel stink, especially in the winter. The 2001 was quite a nimble truck for a diesel. Pulled everything and went everywhere I ever needed to go, didn't mind short trips, and could be idled for hours. I was quite surprised how much change there was with the 2013 after putting 7200 miles on it. These new RAM HD diesel trucks are designed with 2 things in mind, payload and towing on the road. They are AMAZING machines! Off road, they were definetly not as nimble. The ride was smooth for a 3500 truck on pavement but above 68 mph, the stiff rear suspension would fight with the road and cause very annoying vibrations. My bad for getting a CC SB 3500, knew it would be stiff, but the vibrations and rough dirt road performance was not what I anticipated. The diesel technology is amazing...and complicated. I keep my trucks for a while, and decided that I didn't want to keep the truck without having a warranty...I don't make money with the truck...it takes money from me. There to damn expensive a month not to fully enjoy what they offer. Best to be happy, then to fork over thousands a year and keep complaining about things something does or doesn't have.

Lots of dirt roads in our mountain area and I'm mostly driving unloaded. The 2500 6.4 is a very fun truck to drive and nimble without the heavy weight of the 6.7. I like the way a 2500 truck handles our bumper pull camper & horse trailer, and I need it for a gooseneck horse trailer we use. I drove a 6.4L prior to buying the 2013 CTD. I thought it was good, but, just wasn't sure...you know...brand new engine and it was a gasser. Got a good deal on the CTD, so I jumped...might as well give it a try. It finally started getting good mileage when straight No. 2 diesel became available, but that is for only 6 months of the year around here. Blended diesel and short trips just wasn't what the new 6.7 CTD likes. Only 10.5 mpg pulling my 2 place snowmobile trailer with sleds...maybe 3500# total. I wasn't to impressed. Just not going to avoid the crappy blended fuel in the winter. I'm much better off with a gasser during the winter months and I'm only towing heavier during the warmer months, which are short trips (50-80 miles).

I went and test drove another 2500 6.4 after having the 6.7 for 6 months. There was the torque difference, but the ride was fantastic. This 4.10 geared truck actually has better takeoff than the 2013 CTD did because of all the computer nannies they put on the CTD to control emissions on fuel delivery. We are in snow country. There were multiple times when I had to get off the road, turn around or something. That dang heavy 6.7 with the nannies was hard to get going when you needed power on demand. Acted just like a dead pedal for 2-3 seconds, then suddenly this firehose feeling of torque would arrive, but you're either already stuck or blasting out of there ripping the hell out of things. Drove me crazy.

For best economy the 6.7 loved speeds of 55 to 65 and going downhill. The 3.42 gearing had alot to do with that. On a shallow uphill grade west of Town, at 65 mph this 6.4L is within 1 mpg on the EVIC where the 6.7 CTD would be. Going the other way, within 2-3. My engine still has less than 1000 miles, should get a little better. I'm guessing I'll be within 1.5 to 2 mpg of where the 6.7L was.

If your going to be doing alot of traveling in the mountains, living out of your RV from location to location, and putting alot of towing miles on your vehicle, get the CTD! It pulls trailers effortlessly! But if your like me, with alot of short towing trips during a small window of the year, the 6.4L is a good option. It really fulfills my needs better. If you WANT a 6.7 CTD, well then...that is everyones own choice to make. Happy towing!!:smileup:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
45 Posts
Thanks for the info. As a heavy equipment operator I never wanted a diesel pickup because once you figure the $8,000 option and the extra cost of fuel and maintenance a guy really needs to pull a lot of load most of the time to come out. Just my personal choice. I really had reservations on the 6.4L road test done by trailer life but if they really only saw 11 MPG empty they must have been doing all city driving. I will definitely go with the 6.4 now that you and others have given me good info. to go with.
thanks again.
Good luck shopping! The 6.4L really can get some good fuel mileage if you can keep the 410 horses in the corral most the time. It is fun to open the gate and let them run too.:smileup:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,694 Posts
Haha..I could make this quite complicated. Try to keep it short, though I'm a little long winded most the time. I sold a 2001 5.9L CTD QCLB, that I bought new, to get the 2013. Just outgrew the QC with the family and was tired of the diesel stink, especially in the winter. The 2001 was quite a nimble truck for a diesel. Pulled everything and went everywhere I ever needed to go, didn't mind short trips, and could be idled for hours. I was quite surprised how much change there was with the 2013 after putting 7200 miles on it. These new RAM HD diesel trucks are designed with 2 things in mind, payload and towing on the road. They are AMAZING machines! Off road, they were definetly not as nimble. The ride was smooth for a 3500 truck on pavement but above 68 mph, the stiff rear suspension would fight with the road and cause very annoying vibrations. My bad for getting a CC SB 3500, knew it would be stiff, but the vibrations and rough dirt road performance was not what I anticipated. The diesel technology is amazing...and complicated. I keep my trucks for a while, and decided that I didn't want to keep the truck without having a warranty...I don't make money with the truck...it takes money from me. There to damn expensive a month not to fully enjoy what they offer. Best to be happy, then to fork over thousands a year and keep complaining about things something does or doesn't have.

Lots of dirt roads in our mountain area and I'm mostly driving unloaded. The 2500 6.4 is a very fun truck to drive and nimble without the heavy weight of the 6.7. I like the way a 2500 truck handles our bumper pull camper & horse trailer, and I need it for a gooseneck horse trailer we use. I drove a 6.4L prior to buying the 2013 CTD. I thought it was good, but, just wasn't sure...you know...brand new engine and it was a gasser. Got a good deal on the CTD, so I jumped...might as well give it a try. It finally started getting good mileage when straight No. 2 diesel became available, but that is for only 6 months of the year around here. Blended diesel and short trips just wasn't what the new 6.7 CTD likes. Only 10.5 mpg pulling my 2 place snowmobile trailer with sleds...maybe 3500# total. I wasn't to impressed. Just not going to avoid the crappy blended fuel in the winter. I'm much better off with a gasser during the winter months and I'm only towing heavier during the warmer months, which are short trips (50-80 miles).

I went and test drove another 2500 6.4 after having the 6.7 for 6 months. There was the torque difference, but the ride was fantastic. This 4.10 geared truck actually has better takeoff than the 2013 CTD did because of all the computer nannies they put on the CTD to control emissions on fuel delivery. We are in snow country. There were multiple times when I had to get off the road, turn around or something. That dang heavy 6.7 with the nannies was hard to get going when you needed power on demand. Acted just like a dead pedal for 2-3 seconds, then suddenly this firehose feeling of torque would arrive, but you're either already stuck or blasting out of there ripping the hell out of things. Drove me crazy.

For best economy the 6.7 loved speeds of 55 to 65 and going downhill. The 3.42 gearing had alot to do with that. On a shallow uphill grade west of Town, at 65 mph this 6.4L is within 1 mpg on the EVIC where the 6.7 CTD would be. Going the other way, within 2-3. My engine still has less than 1000 miles, should get a little better. I'm guessing I'll be within 1.5 to 2 mpg of where the 6.7L was.

If your going to be doing alot of traveling in the mountains, living out of your RV from location to location, and putting alot of towing miles on your vehicle, get the CTD! It pulls trailers effortlessly! But if your like me, with alot of short towing trips during a small window of the year, the 6.4L is a good option. It really fulfills my needs better. If you WANT a 6.7 CTD, well then...that is everyones own choice to make. Happy towing!!:smileup:
A helpful reply, sounds like I do not do enough towing to justify the steeper costs associated with a diesel.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
185 Posts
I hope it will end up closer to the 15.5 once it is broken in. This is the problem I am having with the new hemi. Trailer life did a test with the new truck and reported just 11 MPG solo and 8.? towing only 7000 Lbs. My 2009 5.7 averages 9.3 MPG towing 7200 Lbs. with 1000 Lbs. in the bed. I was hoping to upgrade to the new 2014 but am having reservations on which hemi to purchase.
My Ecodiesel will tow that really smoothly and deliver 14-16 MPG will doing it. You'll see 23-28 the rest of the time. Buy the diesel and you won't regret it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
318 Posts
The numbers that I am getting with the 392 HEMI in my 3500 Dually is pretty much the same as in my LX SRT... 14-16 mpg in the street and 18-20 mpg on the highway.

Of course, that's me not towing. I still haven't towed anything with her yet. Still in the market for a gooseneck trailer.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,694 Posts
The numbers that I am getting with the 392 HEMI in my 3500 Dually is pretty much the same as in my LX SRT... 14-16 mpg in the street and 18-20 mpg on the highway.

Of course, that's me not towing. I still haven't towed anything with her yet. Still in the market for a gooseneck trailer.
I'd say those numbers are especially good for a 3500 dually.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
212 Posts
My 6.4 2500 CC long bed now has over 14,000 miles. I just put in a K&N filter and it seems to be doing a little better. No trailer: 14.5 mpg. With my 13,000 pound (empty) 5th wheel I am getting around 11-12.5 on Colorado highways, 6 mpg in the steep hill country. Now, this is some pretty steep grades that have a 35-45 speed limit, with lots of curves. Can't get up to speed so it has to run in 1st or 2nd gear.

Why get the 6.4?
1. Cheaper to buy
2. Cheaper to register
3. Cheaper to insure
4. Average 60 cents per gallon less for gas
5. Cheaper to maintain
6. Better mileage when running empty
7. Gas doesn't have the $1000 mandatory emissions service at 70,000 miles
8. Faster starts in traffic
9. Makes more sense unless pulling heavy loads over 40% of the time

I'm not a diesel hater. Have had 5 since 2001. Second Hemi in a 2500, first 6.4L. Loving it every time I drive it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,694 Posts
My 6.4 2500 CC long bed now has over 14,000 miles. I just put in a K&N filter and it seems to be doing a little better. No trailer: 14.5 mpg. With my 13,000 pound (empty) 5th wheel I am getting around 11-12.5 on Colorado highways, 6 mpg in the steep hill country. Now, this is some pretty steep grades that have a 35-45 speed limit, with lots of curves. Can't get up to speed so it has to run in 1st or 2nd gear.

Why get the 6.4?
1. Cheaper to buy
2. Cheaper to register
3. Cheaper to insure
4. Average 60 cents per gallon less for gas
5. Cheaper to maintain
6. Better mileage when running empty
7. Gas doesn't have the $1000 mandatory emissions service at 70,000 miles
8. Faster starts in traffic
9. Makes more sense unless pulling heavy loads over 40% of the time

I'm not a diesel hater. Have had 5 since 2001. Second Hemi in a 2500, first 6.4L. Loving it every time I drive it.
You make a compelling case, excellent points made. :smileup:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
45 Posts
My 6.4 2500 CC long bed now has over 14,000 miles. I just put in a K&N filter and it seems to be doing a little better. No trailer: 14.5 mpg. With my 13,000 pound (empty) 5th wheel I am getting around 11-12.5 on Colorado highways, 6 mpg in the steep hill country. Now, this is some pretty steep grades that have a 35-45 speed limit, with lots of curves. Can't get up to speed so it has to run in 1st or 2nd gear.

I'm not a diesel hater. Have had 5 since 2001. Second Hemi in a 2500, first 6.4L. Loving it every time I drive it.
That is some good info! Thanks for sharing. What speeds you pulling that 13K trailer at? That is some excellent mileage! I pulled our square faced 7000# TT home yesterday in a quartering head-on 15-20 mph wyoming wind. I set the cruise at 65 and the 6.4 stayed in 4th the whole time. The EVIC stayed around 8 & 9 on the way. I find tow/haul very aggressive and believe it doesn't know what 3rd gear is. Jumps from 4th to 2nd. I'm kinda finding out that to use 3rd when pulling, just put in in manual mode and anticipate the shift when needed. What are you finding pulling 13K? Also, how many miles did you put on your 6.4L before it felt like it was broke-in or has there not been any change? I've read the reports, owners seem to say it gets better with mileage.
 
1 - 20 of 269 Posts
About this Discussion
268 Replies
106 Participants
kirkcad
DODGE RAM FORUM
We’re the ultimate Dodge RAM forum to talk about the RAM 1500, 2500 and 3500 including the Cummins powered models.
Full Forum Listing
Top