DODGE RAM FORUM banner

Do you think chrysler should build a balance shaft hemi..?

1 - 20 of 34 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,713 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
So when do you think we`ll see a 5.7 hemi come with balance shafts in the engine to get rid of all the torsional vibrations that this MDS technology is causing. If it were to happen, i hope they use a helical cut gear drive type system...! (then we can listen to everybody whine about the gear whine...lol) A helical cut gear drive would be stronger over a chain drive version, and we wouldnt have to worry about drive chains or plastic chain guides having to be replaced all the time (or breaking, causing sever engine damage) Even if they put a fluid harmonic balancer on the crankshaft, i would think that would help tremendously...! A smoother engine will ALWAYS gain mpg`s. So with adding balance shafts, sure, it would take some HP to run the added gears & shafts, but the offset would be, better mpg`s from a smoother running engine, so that would already remedy that issue. Its a proven fact that it DOES work, and work very well on other engines. Hell even a harley engine has balance shafts in them. I would think chrysler engineers would be giving this some deep thought anyway.

I put a voting poll on this topic, so toss a vote in there and lets see who agree`s on the idea of the torsionally balanced hemi. If you agree or disagree, please post a thread in here why or why not, you think it would or wouldnt benefit the hemi engines.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,788 Posts
A balance shaft would only add weight, use up HP, add complication, add to the cost, and would net almost ZERO effect.

The Hemi does not have a balance issue when in MDS mod. Being a V8 first, it is designed to operate at lower RPMs than the traditional 4cyl engine, so when MDS kick in (typically at lower speeds as the power requirement is reduced), the lower RPM coupled with any demand for power allows us to feel the cylinder firing. This is not so much a balance issue, it's more of an awareness of the power strokes. If you have a very quiet exhaust, this awareness is reduced significantly; a symptom not typical of a balance issue. :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
698 Posts
I agree with brad's assessment here. I had a couple of those really great but really rough running GM 4.3 V-6 engines over the years. That engine does have an inherent imbalance in its design in the rotating assembly, but it oddly doesn't seem to affect the reliability or longevity of the engine. My wife had an '01 Blazer S-10 that had the balancer system, and it was smooth.

Like brad states, the hemi isn't an unbalanced design in this V-8 setup, and I think he's right that the "feel" of the MDS that many notice and in some cases complain about isn't an imbalance issue in the rotating assembly. And it would seem if you tried to address an imbalance with a balancer assembly "if" it was occuring because of MDS or similar cylinder dropping function, you'd get a more horrible imbalance once the engine went back to "normal" operation. So, then you could come up with this fancy balancer cutout system to combat the imbalance at all-cylinder firing. LOL!...a never-ending cycle.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
917 Posts
I have problems with Drive Shaft.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
698 Posts
Ramtx, that can definitely be a problem, but I think the OP's scenario mainly involves engine rotating assembly issues that a counter-balancer is sometimes used to alleviate. Some automotive and many single-cylinder motorcycle engines use the counter-balancer with great success. It's not something you want, however, if it's not totally necessary...extra internal friction in the engine, more weight, more complexity, and more potential service issues. Where they're needed, they can work quite well.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,713 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
Just food for thought....
Do some of you actually KNOW, what a "balance shaft" actually does and its purpose...?

What Are Balance Shafts and their intended purpose ?

Balance shafts are most common in inline four cylinder (straight-4) engines which, due to the asymmetry of their design, have an inherent "second order vibration" (vibrating at twice the engine RPM) which, contrary to popular belief, cannot be eliminated no matter how well the internal components are balanced. This vibration is generated because the movement of the connecting rods in an inline engine is not symmetrical throughout the crankshaft rotation; thus during a given period of crankshaft rotation, the descending pistons and ascending pistons are not always completely opposed in their acceleration, giving rise to a net vertical inertial force twice in each revolution whose intensity increases exponentially with RPM, no matter how closely the components are matched for weight.


The problem increases with larger engine displacement, since the only ways to achieve larger displacement are with a longer piston stroke, increasing the difference in acceleration, or by a larger bore, increasing the mass of the pistons; either way, the magnitude of the inertial vibration increases. For many years, two litres was viewed as the 'unofficial' displacement limit for a production inline four cylinder engine with acceptable NVH characteristics. The development of the General Motors 2.3 litre Quad 4 engine in 1987, described as "rough as a cob" by one automotive reviewer, and its subsequent development into the much more positively received 2.4 litre version with balance shafts confirms the wisdom of this assessment.
The basic concept behind balance shafts has existed for nearly a century and is no longer patentable. Two balance shafts rotate in opposite directions at twice engine speed. Equally sized eccentric weights on these shafts are sized and phased so that the inertial reaction to their counter-rotation cancels out in the horizontal plane, but adds in the vertical plane, giving a net force equal to but 180 degrees out of phase with the undesired second-order vibration of the basic engine, thereby canceling it. (Some motorcycle enthusiasts believe that Honda's original application of this technology to their V-twin motorcycle engine overly damped out the vibration, giving an excessively 'dead' feel, so that they later reduced the size of the balance shafts in order to furnish the rider with some feedback as to engine speed).


So do you still think balance shafts cant work in a hemi engine...? I would have to disagree that they wouldnt work or benefit the hemi engine. But in any case, lets keep the debate going... its very interesting to me and how people persieve a hemi with balance shaft vs. no balance shafts.


As for the hemi and how it vibrates while in MDS mode, imagine driving a stick shift at 20mph while still in 5th gear...same effect happens. It lugs down and just chugs along because the rpm`s are to low for it to make any power to overcome the vibration issue.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
15,440 Posts
Just food for thought....
Do some of you actually KNOW, what a "balance shaft" actually does and its purpose...?
^^^^ Ah yes or I would not have posted. But nice explanation BTW and nothing wrong with a good healthy debate. FYI I am getting no noticable/bothersome vibration when MDS kicks in it just feels like a four cylinder engine as it putts along.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,713 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 · (Edited)
^^^^ Ah yes or I would not have posted. But nice explanation BTW and nothing wrong with a good healthy debate. FYI I am getting no noticable/bothersome vibration when MDS kicks in it just feels like a four cylinder engine as it putts along.
Ahhh yes, i too agree RansRam, with healthy debates, and thank you for contributing. I just hope this one dosent turn into a pizzing contest like most other posts do on most forums.

Guyz....
the only reason i thought of starting a post like this, its because i`ve owned and drove MANY mds hemi trucks (more than you know) and alot of them vibrate terrible when the mds mode kicks in. (can be felt either thru the sterring wheel, seats, gas pedal, or all 3 at once at certain rpm`s) (& not to be confused with the "star case" torque convertor shudder rattle drone issue thats going around, this mds vibe is totally different from that, BUT the bad TC does seem to enhance the vibes worse) What i dont really want to happen here, is what usually happens on these forums, people will judgmentally tell you that you are wrong (about the mds vibrations) just because their`s dosent do it.(not mean`t towards RansRam either) Well i`m here to tell anyone that thinks these trucks dont have vibration issues while in mds mode, they certainly havent drove enough of them to know what i`m talkin about. If it has mds, then they ALL do it, some are just ALOT worse than others. (by the way, i`m only talkin about the mds in the hemi trucks, NOT chargers, challengers or 300 sedans) I started the post by wondering about opinions on the hemi if it were to become a balancer shaft type of engine, and if people agree that this would help the engine vibrations or not. Lets leave the $$cost$$ of what it would set us back, just opinions on whether balancershafts would be good for the hemi engine or not.

I read in here where some think it would rob horsepower, of course it`ll take some hp to run it, but not as much as you might think. Add weight, yes it would, BUT it would be so minimal. You`d be talkin maybe 10 or 15lb weight gain, maybe a 10 or 15hp loss to power the balancershafts. (based on 1hp per 1lb) An alternator alone robs more hp than the balancershafts would. You can easily pick up 15hp just by eliminating the viscous clutch fan and adding totally electric fans.

This is just my opinion, i would rather gain a few pounds and have an engine thats smooth as butter, than a lighter design that sends vibrations all over the place. I think we can all agree that a smoother engine is a happier engine... hence last alot longer, small percentage of mpg gains as well. I also know with tuners they have available today, and exhaust, you could simply get a big boost in horsepower back easily enough if it really bothered you. Ther`s lots of things that could be done to gain hp, and not spend a fortune doing it either.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,713 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
A balance shaft would only add weight, use up HP, add complication, add to the cost, and would net almost ZERO effect.

The Hemi does not have a balance issue when in MDS mod. Being a V8 first, it is designed to operate at lower RPMs than the traditional 4cyl engine, so when MDS kick in (typically at lower speeds as the power requirement is reduced), the lower RPM coupled with any demand for power allows us to feel the cylinder firing. This is not so much a balance issue, it's more of an awareness of the power strokes. If you have a very quiet exhaust, this awareness is reduced significantly; a symptom not typical of a balance issue. :)
Brad, i dont think i ever said the engine is out of balance. What i`m getting at, is torsional vibrations.
Go back and read where i have written; What Are Balance Shafts and their intended purpose ? POST #7
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
698 Posts
Well, I think I generally understand engine balancer systems, maybe better described as counterbalancing systems...at least as well as the Wikipedia text you cited here...and it's a decent description that they provide. What in our responses caused you to ask if we even understood what the system involved? I've had automotive and motorcycle engines with the system and have even had some of those engines apart and had to reinstall and time the balancing system.

Still, this system is almost always used to address an engine design that has an inherent imbalance in the design of the rotating assembly...crank, rods, and pistons particularly...an assymetrical combination of how those components rotate in or out of balance as a whole. Your wiki article didn't even mention V-8's and such, though I'm sure you could find one somewhere with an oddball crank design. Our hemi is not one of those inherently imbalanced engines in this category.

I still go back to my question in my first post. If you could design a balancer system that would address the MDS vibration when MDS is functioning, what will you do to disable the system when all 8 cylinders are firing normally? I still think these systems are mainly designed for engines that have assymetric design and placement of their major rotating components that are causing annoying vibration. Our hemi is in relative design balance. The vibration from MDS might indeed be addressable, but perhaps it would be by some other cancelling effect by another method...not the full-time function of a conventional engine balancer system...at least the ones I've seen anything about.

Interesting discussion...as long as we realize that few of us here are engineers, but it will do until a real, bonafide, fire-breathing engineer arrives to set us straight...LOL!:LOL:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,788 Posts
I was trying to keep my explanation short and sweet. :4-dontknow:

The Hemi being a 90 degree V8 engine with power strokes at every 90 degrees of crank shaft rotation is operationally inherently balanced by design. When the MDS system deactivates cyl 1,4,6 & 7, (every second cyl in the firing order), the engine still maintains operationally inherent balance as not only are the power strokes at every 180 deg of engine rotation, but every power stroke is 90 off axis from the previous. This is a huge difference from an inline 4 cyl engine where although the power strokes are at 180 deg of crank rotation, they are in the same vertical plane.

Although the V8 benefits hugely from this 90 deg power stroke offset, there still remains parasitic deflection in the vertical direction, however it is not a direct vertical deflection, but rather a sinusoidal or oscillating deflection. This also plays a huge roll in why the 90 deg V8 design is capable of such smooth operation....especially when running on all 8.

Could this deflection (and associated 'vibration') be reduced with the deployment of balance shafts...Absolutely! Similar results could achieved by increasing the mass of the engine, but for purpose of staying on topic, I'll limit my discussion to the balance shaft(s).

In order to achieve a vibration reduction using balance shafts, you would likely require 6 balance shafts. 2 would be required to be aligned with each cylinder bank rotating in opposite directions so as not to add vibration in the + and - 90deg plan from the bank. Then an additional 2 would be required aligned to the vertical plane, and carefully adjusted to be slightly out of phase to contract the sinusoidal deflection mentioned earlier. (I can only assume this can be done with only 2....but have never tested this in the real world).

If you install the 2 shafts per bank, why would you need the extra 2+? After all, if you have reduced/eliminated the effects of the power strokes with the bank shafts, there should be nothing left to cause the sinusoidal deflection and associated vibration!
Well......If your going through all the trouble to design a balance shaft system to reduce the effect of MDS, why would you stop there? Might as well complete the job and remove the minimal vibration caused by the rotating mass and get rid of the harmonic balancer which is nothing more than a inexpensive and somewhat effective replacement for a balance shaft system.

To answer your question -
So when do you think we`ll see a 5.7 hemi come with balance shafts in the engine to get rid of all the torsional vibrations that this MDS technology is causing.
Never!

I am not disputing the fact that balance shaft systems have been deployed with excellent results on some engines. But in these cases, there is an inherent imbalance that virtually dictated the necessity of balance shafts. In the case of the Harley engines, they actually did it too well to start with, and had to reduce the effect of the balance shafts to give the operator some 'seat of the pants' feedback as to what RPM the engine was turning at, so they obviously work.

In the case of the Hemi -
a) the additional cost to deploy such a system would increase the cost of the engine (likely not going to be very popular)
b) would increase the weight of the engine (which would further reduce the payload of the truck)
c) would add additional complexity to an already complex engine (DIY is tough enough as it is)
d) would reduce the available HP by whatever amount the balance shafts used (IDK about you, but I didn't buy the Hemi because of it's Rolls Royce super smooth engine operation)

And to add to all of this, the balance shafts would have to change in mass between MDS and non-MDS mode, or the vibration would become an 8cyl characteristic at more then double the effect! :str:

Simply, it does not make sense to deploy this type of expensive complexity to an engine that really doesn't have a problem to begin with. Is there a small amount of vibration from the engine when MDS is activated - YES! But even with the factory Alpine sound system, I can drown out this vibration at even a modest listening level, and the Alpine Sub is not that punchy. :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
31 Posts
vibration

I talked to the service director last week and he said after talking to the factory rep, dodge is coming out with some type of frame attached torsional damper for the exhaust system, he wasn't very specific as to when it would be available but he would let me know asap when he has more info let's hope it's soon
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
698 Posts
Well explained, brad. I ran out of steam before getting to the much meatier application of balancer systems like you did...LOL!

Big Al, that's an interesting comment about the torsional damper. In my post that's what I was kind of touching on about MDS feedback perhaps being addressable by some other means than an engine balancer system...which I don't believe is applicable here.

From another angle, you know Chrysler has had to have done some study on this issue over time now. The method that some hemi owners are using to disable MDS...other than by a tuner on applicable models...with engaging tow/haul mode or clicking down one button position on the shifter seems to work. However, I'm wondering if Chrysler has done testing that shows it adversely affects mileage too much to disable MDS except during highway and overall higher speed use. I read here where some claim fuel mileage to increase when they disabled MDS, but frankly I think more is going on there than meets the eye. I don't think Chrysler would keep MDS active throughout the driving range if it hadn't produce an increase in mileage. You just know they're aware of some of the complaints about MDS drone, shudder, and vibration. The easiest fix would be to just disable MDS until some higher vehicle speed is attained. Still, I don't find either the transmission or MDS to be particularly annoying. I can detect it in some situations, but I don't get bucking and serious vibration like some have described here. Plus, and I'm not trying to piss anyone off here, in the cases where there's not a malfunction of some kind, I think some owners are just hypersensitive by nature to "anything" that doesn't deliver an almost electric motor-like delivery...whether it's the engine, tranny, or other elements in the vehicle that roll, rotate, or move. I'm not saying we should settle for something that rattles our fillings, but a pickup isn't a Bentley or Rolls...LOL! Or...is there a manual transmission option for the 1500 Ram?...LOL!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,713 Posts
Discussion Starter · #15 · (Edited)
1) Could this deflection (and associated 'vibration') be reduced with the deployment of balance shafts...Absolutely!


2) To answer your question -
Never!

3) In the case of the Harley engines, they actually did it too well to start with, and had to reduce the effect of the balance shafts to give the operator some 'seat of the pants' feedback as to what RPM the engine was turning at, so they obviously work.

4) In the case of the Hemi -
IDK about you, but I didn't buy the Hemi because of it's Rolls Royce super smooth engine operation


5) Simply, it does not make sense to deploy this type of expensive complexity to an engine that really doesn't have a problem to begin with. Is there a small amount of vibration from the engine when MDS is activated - YES! But even with the factory Alpine sound system, I can drown out this vibration at even a modest listening level, and the Alpine Sub is not that punchy. :)

1) CORRECT...!

2) Dont bet on it. Ther`s MANY complaints of mds vibration`s.

3) It wasnt harley this happened to, it was honda.
(Fact: harley got it right the first time when they introduced it in the 2000 beta engine)

4) The hemi engine IS very smooth:smileup: UNTIL the mds kicks in.:smiledown:

5) It DOES have a problem...the mds IS causing vibrations.
Two of your sentences in #5 above, kind of conterdict each other.
"doesn't have a problem to begin with. Is there a small amount of
vibration from the engine when MDS is activated - YES!
"


:hah:
Drown out the vibration(s) with your alpine stereo...???
Vibrations are felt, not heard usually, but i guess in your case,
just buy a bigger stereo is the fix...lol

Thank you for your contribution brad
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,713 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
Big Al, that's an interesting comment about the torsional damper. In my post that's what I was kind of touching on about MDS feedback perhaps being addressable by some other means than an engine balancer system...which I don't believe is applicable here.
I`m already workin on an external damper system for the mds hemi,
just a matter of time to perfect it. Its still in the testing phases as we speak.
So far, it showing us VERY GOOD progress that it will work very well...!!!! We are also looking into motor & tranny mount materials, to also combat the vibrations.

Now if we could only develope the mds mode to sound like a V8 while in use...!!!:LOL:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,788 Posts
1) CORRECT...!

2) Dont bet on it. Ther`s MANY complaints of mds vibration`s.

3) It wasnt harley this happened to, it was honda.
(Fact: harley got it right the first time when they introduced it in the 2000 beta engine)

4) The hemi engine IS very smooth:smileup: UNTIL the mds kicks in.:smiledown:

5) It DOES have a problem...the mds IS causing vibrations.
Two of your sentences in #5 above, kind of conterdict each other.
"doesn't have a problem to begin with. Is there a small amount of
vibration from the engine when MDS is activated - YES!
"


:hah:
Drown out the vibration(s) with your alpine stereo...???
Vibrations are felt, not heard usually, but i guess in your case,
just buy a bigger stereo is the fix...lol

Thank you for your contribution brad
I don't for a minute deny that there are complaints about the 'feel' and the 'sound' of the MDS, but in reality, this is a truck! For those that complain about it not being the smoothest vehicle they have ever driven, they really need to carefully consider their purchase decision. I've spoken about this 'human' issue before with regard to the transmission, where the shifting has been slowed down to smooth it out, BUT, the heat generated by this slow shifting causes heat which is simply not good for the trans. In a truck application, we SHOULD be purchasing it because we need it to do work, not prissy foot around the dance floor looking pretty. If someone doesn't like the rough and rugged feel of a truck, then don't buy one.

To Dodge - Please don't cave to unrealistic demand for a truck that rides and operates like a luxury car. For those of us that buy a truck for work applications are the ones that are truly suffering in the end when the truck becomes a facade rather then a working tool.

Are you sure about Harley? Were they not the first to figure out the negative side of 'Too Smooth' and unlike Honda made the appropriate adjustments 'prior' to releasing the design to the public. I know Honda figured that out later in the game, when they discovered there is such a thing as 'Too Smooth'. LOL

The Hemi engine does run very smooth even in MDS, however under acceleration in MDS mode, you can feel the power strokes which closely emulate the same feeling you get when driving a 4cyl engine under load at too low an RPM....it's a lugging feeling. I do not consider this to be a problem, but rather a characteristic. I knew when I used the word vibration to describe this, that I was using the wrong word....although this lugging feeling as also a 'vibration' by it's truest definition. It's one of those things where even with all the words available, finding the right one can sometimes prove to be as challenging as convincing your neighbor that a truck is work tool, not a trophy to display in your driveway.

In my case, the lugging feeling is easily drown out by the 'Vibration' of the Alpine sub, and 'Drone' is easily drown out by the remainder of the speakers in the audio system. This is accomplished a low enough sound level to carry on a conversation in the cab.....which is one more reason I do not consider this to be a problem. The minor cracks in the road transfer a greater vibration to the 'seat dyno' then the MDS does.

BTW - Great thread! I had not ever considered the deployment of a balanced shaft system in any V8, let alone the Hemi. But the more thought I give this, the more I believe this would be about the worst thing that could be done to the Hemi....or any V8 for that matter. I think we will see electric motor systems long before we see balance shafts in any V8, and after driving a Chevy Hybrid truck; I for one am not looking forward to that day......Too Smooth! :str:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,713 Posts
Discussion Starter · #18 ·
I don't for a minute deny that there are complaints about the 'feel' and the 'sound' of the MDS, but in reality, this is a truck! For those that complain about it not being the smoothest vehicle they have ever driven, they really need to carefully consider their purchase decision. I've spoken about this 'human' issue before with regard to the transmission, where the shifting has been slowed down to smooth it out, BUT, the heat generated by this slow shifting causes heat which is simply not good for the trans. In a truck application, we SHOULD be purchasing it because we need it to do work, not prissy foot around the dance floor looking pretty. If someone doesn't like the rough and rugged feel of a truck, then don't buy one.

To Dodge - Please don't cave to unrealistic demand for a truck that rides and operates like a luxury car. For those of us that buy a truck for work applications are the ones that are truly suffering in the end when the truck becomes a facade rather then a working tool.

Are you sure about Harley? Were they not the first to figure out the negative side of 'Too Smooth' and unlike Honda made the appropriate adjustments 'prior' to releasing the design to the public. I know Honda figured that out later in the game, when they discovered there is such a thing as 'Too Smooth'. LOL

The Hemi engine does run very smooth even in MDS, however under acceleration in MDS mode, you can feel the power strokes which closely emulate the same feeling you get when driving a 4cyl engine under load at too low an RPM....it's a lugging feeling. I do not consider this to be a problem, but rather a characteristic. I knew when I used the word vibration to describe this, that I was using the wrong word....although this lugging feeling as also a 'vibration' by it's truest definition. It's one of those things where even with all the words available, finding the right one can sometimes prove to be as challenging as convincing your neighbor that a truck is work tool, not a trophy to display in your driveway.

In my case, the lugging feeling is easily drown out by the 'Vibration' of the Alpine sub, and 'Drone' is easily drown out by the remainder of the speakers in the audio system. This is accomplished a low enough sound level to carry on a conversation in the cab.....which is one more reason I do not consider this to be a problem. The minor cracks in the road transfer a greater vibration to the 'seat dyno' then the MDS does.

BTW - Great thread! I had not ever considered the deployment of a balanced shaft system in any V8, let alone the Hemi. But the more thought I give this, the more I believe this would be about the worst thing that could be done to the Hemi....or any V8 for that matter. I think we will see electric motor systems long before we see balance shafts in any V8, and after driving a Chevy Hybrid truck; I for one am not looking forward to that day......Too Smooth! :str:
Brad,
you must be one of the lucky few people that dont have one of these trucks where the mds will just buzz your teeth out of your mouth when its in mds mode. I`ll tell ya dude, i`ve drove quite a few that will just make you wanna cry for buying it, some are THAT bad when it kicks into mds mode. I`m working with a friend of mine that i work with, his mds is so bad, he is just livid for ever buying the truck. (his isnt the only one i`ve road tested that is this bad either) My truck has the same issue, BUT, it isnt near as bad as his is. His truck feels like it came out of a porn shop after they installed vibrators in his seat and the steering wheel, AND the gas pedal. Its really bad dude, his is the worst i`ve seen yet out of all the ones i have drivin. After driving & testing a few others, i notice the mds vibrations vary between all of them, some ok, some are definatly not. This vibration dosen`t seem to hit until you get a few hundred miles on the truck from brand new, so as for your comment on knowing this when a person buys the truck brand new, and that one should have known this would happen because its a truck, thats weak brother. Had i known these trucks would get worse, it might have changed the deal before buying it. Trust me, people aren`t just going to go ahead an buy a vehicle knowing it will have problems or issues, especially for what we pay for these vehicles today.

As to your comment about buying a truck to be used as a truck, i have to highly disagree with you ther buddie. I`ve never bought or owned a truck to be a "working tool". Some people buy a truck just for the sake of looks alone and never use it for the purpose of just a work vehicle. I am one of those in that particular catagory... i never haul or tow anything with my truck, i bought it because i like the looks, i dont use it for anything else but a daily driver vehicle. Ther is ALOT more people today that dont buy a truck to use it as a truck. So with saying that, ther ARE some that just buy them to be driveway queens. I guess thats what i bought mine for then...a driveway queen and lovin it.(lol) I buy trucks because thats what i like driving, and not one truck that i`ve ever owned has ever had anything put or laid in the box. Not even dust..!(lol) Also, i would bet money, that most people that own a HEMI R/T truck, do not use them as a truck, or your term, "working tool". Some people will buy them to be show trucks, or just to have a toy to play with without ever using it as a truck.

Yes, i`m sure about what i said about harley. I am very deep into the harley world. One of my best friends is an engineer for harley. I usually know whats going on with them before the actual assembly line people even do. I also build alot of screamin eagle race engines, so i`m very up on whats going on with harley, and alot of other motorcycle manufactuers with research & development as well, and for many many years.

Re: "I had not ever considered the deployment of a balanced shaft system in any V8"
Dont knock it until you`ve tried it. Silent balance shafts could possibly work very well in V8 engines. Ther happens to be some very exotic V8 race engines out there today that have silent balance shafts in them. (any i`ve seen, are gear drivin)

Your comment about "too smooth".... ther again i happen to disagree.
I dont think people would buy a vehicle if it wasnt smooth to a certain degree. That was the biggest selling point when i bought my very first hemi truck, it was smooth as butter. I highly dought, that a person goes into a dealership and asking them for the roughest most vibrating new truck on the lot(lol) Whats the first question a hemi truck buyer is asked on a test drive with these new hemi trucks when he lets his ford and chevy buddies test drive it, "wow, i cant believe how smooth it is...!" Thats why my friend bought one. He took mine for a drive and couldnt comment enough on how smooth it was, and this was a guy that was hardcore chevy and hated dodge`s. So now, he`s gotta brand new 2011 hemi truck and hating how bad his vibrates after adding 4,000 miles onto it and mine dosent vibrate like his does and mine has 33,000 miles and still kinda smooth with the exception to the mds vibes. Now he`s a dodge hater because the mds is horrible in his truck. He`s been back to the dealer several times, he`s now looking into legal actions to possibly make them buy it back. I dont blame him, i`d be doing the same thing. I wouldnt put up with how bad his vibrates.

Thanks again brad, i rather enjoy this post too, it brings new thoughts and idea`s into somethin nobody else has ever asked before. You`re a pretty knowlegable person, and its great that we can agree to disagree on some things.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
698 Posts
OK, to keep this discussion going a bit, let me ask this. Do the other hemi vehicles in the Chrysler line have MDS? I know I could start searching other forums and/or Chrysler product sites to try and find out, but I'm sure some here already know this. As I've mentioned a few times already, I'm totally new to Chrysler products. Are there similar complaints about other vehicles in the Chrysler line that may have MDS?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,713 Posts
Discussion Starter · #20 ·
OK, to keep this discussion going a bit, let me ask this. Do the other hemi vehicles in the Chrysler line have MDS? I know I could start searching other forums and/or Chrysler product sites to try and find out, but I'm sure some here already know this. As I've mentioned a few times already, I'm totally new to Chrysler products. Are there similar complaints about other vehicles in the Chrysler line that may have MDS?
Yes, all the hemi vehicles from when the MDS was introduced into their particular lineup, with exception to the 2500 ram hemi truck which does not have mds. Any hemi that has mds, does vibrate, BUT ONCE AGAIN, some are alot more noticeable than others. We can debate the mds vibe issue all day long, but until the people that havent felt it with a hemi that has very bad mds vibes, they`ll never experience what some are feeling and then they usually end up disagreeing with people on here that HAVE felt it because theirs dosent vibrate as bad or hardly at all. To the people that dont have an issue with it, go drive one that DOES have bad mds vibe issues, then you`ll know what its all about.
 
1 - 20 of 34 Posts
Top