What many don't know- yes- the testers are not blessed with money- but their company is supplied with vehicles to test. They test, what they can get. and when they test good for a company, they get an extra stack of test vehicles. otherway around- why would they say anything good about a solution, when the company, making it does not give them enough treatment in form of test vehicles? The other thing is- that some companies allow the "private" use of their test vehicles, where others just plain allow to drive the tests. all those little goodies influence the test results.
If you look at European auto-magazines- they test 5 vehicles- a 5-series BMW against a Toyota, a LADA, a Mercedes and a Fiat and at the end the Golf wins, because it has the biggest trunk. No joke.
I read comparization tests, where at the end the reporter stated, that if the golf would had been tested, it would had won the competition, because it's better than all of the tested vehicles. Yes, I read it- black on white.
They even tested a RAM against one of those VW pickups- called Amarok - and trust me- I'm not lying- the Amarok with a 2.0 Turbodiesel WON! in all categories- You can't make this stuff up! They even went to the Hockenheim Ring Race Track and showed, that the Amarok is better to race than the RAM.
This does not come from nowhere, if you know, how much VW pumps into those magazines.
I trust auto magazines, JD Power and other institutions as much as I trust my dog in a room with a plate of bacon, not to eat the bacon.
From this point of view- just read the tests, when it comes to rotary shifter, with RAM and with Fusion. The fusion has the same functional rotary shifter and there it's the second greatest invention after the wheel. So much for "opinion" from a 3rd class reporter.